[arin-ppml] Discussion Petition of ARIN-prop-125 Efficient Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack
frnkblk at iname.com
Thu Dec 30 14:18:01 EST 2010
Which is why perhaps prop 125 should be modified to allow transfers sans
IPv6. That might even kickstart the transfer market.
From: Matthew Kaufman [mailto:matthew at matthew.at]
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 1:03 PM
To: frnkblk at iname.com
Cc: 'Bret Palsson'; arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Discussion Petition of ARIN-prop-125 Efficient
Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack
On 12/30/2010 10:46 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> It's possible that if prop 125 passed that the prices for transferred IPv4
> space would go up earlier than if we waited for ARIN's free pool to
> evaporate. Those with IPv4 space to sell would price in the fact that
> IPv4-only shops can't get more IPv4 space from ARIN's free pool.
The proposal as-is would also prevent transfers to entities that hadn't
deployed IPv6. So there'd be *no* transfer market during this time...
except a grey/black one.
More information about the ARIN-PPML