[arin-ppml] Discussion Petition of ARIN-prop-125 Efficient Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack

[Jason Schiller]

Frank,

Would you be in favor of supporting the petetion...


A: As written?

B: As written with a different defination for "real deployment of IPv6" 
which may or may not be dual stack?

C: As written, but not applying to specified transfers?

D: As written with a different defination for "real deployment of IPv6" 
which may or may not be dual stack, and not applying to specified 
transfers?


__Jason

==========================================================================
Jason Schiller                                               (703)886.6648
Senior Internet Network Engineer                         fax:(703)886.0512
Public IP Global Network Engineering                       schiller at uu.net
UUNET / Verizon                         jason.schiller at verizonbusiness.com

The good news about having an email address that is twice as long is that
it increases traffic on the Internet.

On Thu, 30 Dec 2010, Frank Bulk wrote:

|Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:18:01 -0600
|From: Frank Bulk <frnkblk at iname.com>
|To: matthew at matthew.at
|Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
|Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Discussion Petition of ARIN-prop-125 Efficient
|    Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack
|
|Which is why perhaps prop 125 should be modified to allow transfers sans
|IPv6.  That might even kickstart the transfer market.
|
|Frank
|
|-----Original Message-----
|From: Matthew Kaufman [mailto:matthew at matthew.at] 
|Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 1:03 PM
|To: frnkblk at iname.com
|Cc: 'Bret Palsson'; arin-ppml at arin.net
|Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Discussion Petition of ARIN-prop-125 Efficient
|Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack
|
|On 12/30/2010 10:46 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
|> It's possible that if prop 125 passed that the prices for transferred IPv4
|> space would go up earlier than if we waited for ARIN's free pool to
|> evaporate.  Those with IPv4 space to sell would price in the fact that
|> IPv4-only shops can't get more IPv4 space from ARIN's free pool.
|The proposal as-is would also prevent transfers to entities that hadn't 
|deployed IPv6. So there'd be *no* transfer market during this time... 
|except a grey/black one.
|
|Matthew Kaufman
|
|_______________________________________________
|PPML
|You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
|the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
|Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
|http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
|Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
|