[arin-ppml] Discussion Petition of ARIN-prop-125 Efficient Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack

[Owen DeLong]

The discussion can take place with or without moving this proposal forward.

Owen

On Dec 27, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Chris Grundemann wrote:

> Hi Bill,
> 
> Supporting the petition to move this proposal forward could allow precisely that discussion to take place.
> 
> Cheers
> ~Chris
> 
> My Android sent this message.
> 
> 
>> On Dec 27, 2010 7:17 AM, "William Herrin" <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann at gmail.com> wrote: >4.1.4. IPv6 Deploy...
>> 
>> I DO NOT SUPPORT the petition to move proposal 125 forward. Although I
>> support the concept of requiring IPv6 deployment in order to continue
>> consuming IPv4 addresses, this particular proposal is gratuitously
>> heavy-handed.
>> 
>> If a comparable proposal were brought forward which does not attempt
>> to micro-manage an organization's IPv6 deployment process, I would
>> support it and, if necessary support a petition to move it forward.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Bill Herrin
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
>> 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
>> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20101227/08ddd0e5/attachment.htm>