[arin-ppml] Discussion Petition of ARIN-prop-125 Efficient Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack

[Jason Schiller]

Bill,

I get the impression that you support the concept of requiring IPv6 
deployment for those organizations that continue to need additional IPv4 
addresses.  

If that is the case, I would be interested to hear what particular portion 
of the text you are comfortable with, and what portion of the text you are 
uncomfortable with.  What suggestions would you have for re-writes? 

I know that a small group of us discussed at length how to strike the 
right balance.  It is possible that in our consideration of that balance 
we missed something, so your, and the rest of the community's input on 
this would certainly be welcomed.  

I think that this is an important topic that needs discussion, even if 
this petition is not sucessful.


For the record I support this petition.

__Jason



==========================================================================
Jason Schiller                                               (703)886.6648
Senior Internet Network Engineer                         fax:(703)886.0512
Public IP Global Network Engineering                       schiller at uu.net
UUNET / Verizon                         jason.schiller at verizonbusiness.com

The good news about having an email address that is twice as long is that
it increases traffic on the Internet.

On Mon, 27 Dec 2010, William Herrin wrote:

|Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 09:17:34 -0500
|From: William Herrin <bill at herrin.us>
|To: Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann at gmail.com>
|Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
|Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Discussion Petition of ARIN-prop-125 Efficient
|    Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack
|
|On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann at gmail.com> wrote:
|>4.1.4. IPv6 Deployment
|>
|>When addresses are used to provide an Internet facing service, the
|>service must be fully IPv6 accessible (if you deploy an A record, you
|>must also have a AAAA record, and both must answer).
|
|I DO NOT SUPPORT the petition to move proposal 125 forward. Although I
|support the concept of requiring IPv6 deployment in order to continue
|consuming IPv4 addresses, this particular proposal is gratuitously
|heavy-handed.
|
|If a comparable proposal were brought forward which does not attempt
|to micro-manage an organization's IPv6 deployment process, I would
|support it and, if necessary support a petition to move it forward.
|
|Regards,
|Bill Herrin
|
|
|-- 
|William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
|3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
|Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
|_______________________________________________
|PPML
|You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
|the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
|Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
|http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
|Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
|