[arin-ppml] Does this apply to Transfers too?
Kevin Kargel
kkargel at polartel.com
Tue Apr 21 14:39:06 EDT 2009
> -----Original Message-----
> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
> Behalf Of michael.dillon at bt.com
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 1:02 PM
> To: ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Does this apply to Transfers too?
>
> > What it will boil down to is that some executive will call
> > the NetAdmin in to his office look him in the eye and say
> > "Are you absolutely darned sure this is accurate" and the
> > NetAdmin will say "Yes, I wouldn't have written it down if it
> > weren't." and the (COO or some such) will sign the affidavit
> > based on the word of the NetAdmin who the COO trusts.
>
> What world are you living in? The executives who did that in
> Enron, Worldcom, Tyco and others, are now sitting in jail.
> The Sarbanes-Oxley act is not just law, but common corporate
> practice even for companies that are not incorporated under
> U.S. jusrisdiction.
>
I agree 100% that there will (should?) need to be changes in the way
accounting is done, at a very minimum for those companies subject to SOX. I
also agree that the "officer" should double check with his audit team (if
such exists). That should happen now. I suspect it rarely does (or rarely
even exists).
This is one reason that there will be more CTO chairs in the executive
boardrooms in the future.
I live in the small business world. And I like it here. It is a nice
world.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3224 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20090421/a5cbc52f/attachment.bin>
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list