[arin-ppml] DFZ Table Size (was: the Transfer Policy Argument Space)

[David Farmer]

This is on the verge of begin a discussion of the merits of the argument, it is 
an important discussion, but let's make it a separate thread please

Thanks.

On 3 Sep 2008 Paul Schopis wrote:

> John,
> Your number 4 resonates with me. I think I keep hearing arguments that
>  are self satisfying, ie gives "me" a strategic and/or economic 
> advantage. The perceived benefit can all be undone for many if not the
>  community at large by 'breaking" the basic function of that we are 
> trying to extend.
> 
> David,
> Thanks for your proposal. It is down right rational.

Thanks.

> paul
> 
> On Sep 3, 2008, at 9:48 AM, John Schnizlein wrote:
> 
> > 4. How much burden on the routing infrastructure (DFZ) would be
> > produced by the de-aggregation that would result from a transfer
> > policy?  For example, is the constraint that transfers must be
> > within the space administered by a single RIR necessary?
> 



=======================================================
David Farmer				     Email:	farmer at umn.edu
Office of Information Technology
Networking & Telecomunication Services
University of Minnesota			     Phone:	612-626-0815
2218 University Ave SE			     Cell:		612-812-9952
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029		     FAX:	612-626-1818
=======================================================