[arin-ppml] the Transfer Policy Argument Space

[Paul Schopis]

John,
Your number 4 resonates with me. I think I keep hearing arguments that  
are self satisfying, ie gives "me" a strategic and/or economic  
advantage. The perceived benefit can all be undone for many if not the  
community at large by 'breaking" the basic function of that we are  
trying to extend.

David,
Thanks for your proposal. It is down right rational.

paul

On Sep 3, 2008, at 9:48 AM, John Schnizlein wrote:

> 4. How much burden on the routing infrastructure (DFZ) would be
> produced by the de-aggregation that would result from a transfer
> policy?  For example, is the constraint that transfers must be within
> the space administered by a single RIR necessary?