[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-4 - a consensus opinion?

[cja@daydream.com]

Bill,

I am sure /32s will be very popular.  Let's add the equivalent for IPv6  and
we're all set.  !   The MICRO-ALLOCATION-GRRL (tm) torch has been handed off
to you though.   So knock yourself out.  :-)

----Cathy
(Formerly known as MICRO-ALLOCATION-GRRL currently known as Moose Whisperer)

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:59 PM, <bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 05:32:39PM -0500, David Farmer wrote:
> > > Let's have a minimum allocation boundary that works for everybody in
> > > the ARIN region (or better yet all RIRs) and be done with this.
> >
> > This is like saying that there should be one and only one global set of
> Zoning
> > laws.  And, I don't believe in a one size fits all world.
> >
>
>        well, not to toss cold H2O on the fire, but routing is either
>        bilateral or global in scope... if one takes the view that
>        minalloc size affects global routing, then one-size does fit
>        the whole world...
>
>        that said, perhaps it is time to re-animate -MICRO-ALLOCATION GRRL-
> (tm)
>        and argue that the correct minium allocation for now should be
>        a /32, regardless of address family.
>
>        Cathy, are you up for it?
>
> --bill
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20081012/a1807e19/attachment.htm>