[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-4 - a consensus opinion?
packetgrrl at gmail.com
Sun Oct 12 15:36:52 EDT 2008
I am sure /32s will be very popular. Let's add the equivalent for IPv6 and
we're all set. ! The MICRO-ALLOCATION-GRRL (tm) torch has been handed off
to you though. So knock yourself out. :-)
(Formerly known as MICRO-ALLOCATION-GRRL currently known as Moose Whisperer)
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:59 PM, <bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 05:32:39PM -0500, David Farmer wrote:
> > > Let's have a minimum allocation boundary that works for everybody in
> > > the ARIN region (or better yet all RIRs) and be done with this.
> > This is like saying that there should be one and only one global set of
> > laws. And, I don't believe in a one size fits all world.
> well, not to toss cold H2O on the fire, but routing is either
> bilateral or global in scope... if one takes the view that
> minalloc size affects global routing, then one-size does fit
> the whole world...
> that said, perhaps it is time to re-animate -MICRO-ALLOCATION GRRL-
> and argue that the correct minium allocation for now should be
> a /32, regardless of address family.
> Cathy, are you up for it?
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML