<div dir="ltr">Bill,<br><br>I am sure /32s will be very popular. Let's add the equivalent for IPv6 and we're all set. ! The MICRO-ALLOCATION-GRRL (tm) torch has been handed off to you though. So knock yourself out. :-)<br>
<br>----Cathy<br>(Formerly known as MICRO-ALLOCATION-GRRL currently known as Moose Whisperer)<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:59 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com">bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 05:32:39PM -0500, David Farmer wrote:<br>
> > Let's have a minimum allocation boundary that works for everybody in<br>
> > the ARIN region (or better yet all RIRs) and be done with this.<br>
><br>
> This is like saying that there should be one and only one global set of Zoning<br>
> laws. And, I don't believe in a one size fits all world.<br>
><br>
<br>
well, not to toss cold H2O on the fire, but routing is either<br>
bilateral or global in scope... if one takes the view that<br>
minalloc size affects global routing, then one-size does fit<br>
the whole world...<br>
<br>
that said, perhaps it is time to re-animate -MICRO-ALLOCATION GRRL- (tm)<br>
and argue that the correct minium allocation for now should be<br>
a /32, regardless of address family.<br>
<br>
Cathy, are you up for it?<br>
<br>
--bill<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
PPML<br>
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to<br>
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).<br>
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br>
<a href="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml" target="_blank">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>
Please contact <a href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a> if you experience any issues.<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>