[arin-ppml] 464: was (Re: IPv6 adoption, map-encap for IPv4?)
Daniel_Alexander at Cable.Comcast.com
Sat Jun 14 10:08:12 EDT 2008
In a short answer yes. Comcast has every intention of providing a
customer an IPv6 address. All the trials are looking at options as to
how to provide a scalable solution, to a scenario where all services do
not exist on either Internet, and IPv4 resources are not readily
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
Behalf Of Lee Dilkie
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 9:03 AM
To: Durand, Alain
Cc: PPML; Paul_Vixie at isc.org
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] 464: was (Re: IPv6 adoption, map-encap for
Alain Durand wrote:
> I think I need to clarify. We are *NOT* deploying 464 today to our
> customers. Our service remains and will remain as long as possible
> classic IPv4. 464 is a very promising technology that we are looking
> - Alain.
I understand that you are looking at this as a means to reduce IPv4
address space usage by sharing one address amongst multiple customers,
and that's a novel approach. What I am more interested in is whether you
plan on offering IPv6 to your customers as well? This could be the
absolutely best-case scenario if you did, as an obvious solution to the
share-ed NAT problem (uPnP, no port forwarding...) your customers would
experience. It both creates a demand for IPv6 and offers a solution at
the same time.
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN
Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact the ARIN Member Services Help Desk at info at arin.net if
you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML