[ppml] ARIN commments regarding Lame Delegation Policy
Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz
Fri Sep 14 10:42:49 EDT 2007
At 10:11 -0400 9/14/07, Member Services wrote:
>Using the 18.104.22.168/19 example posted on ppml, each name server would
>be tested for all 32 reverse zones. A name server would be deemed lame
>only when all zones fail. If one or more of the reverse zones in the /19
>is configured properly for a given name server, the name server
>delegation for that /19 would be declared 'good'.
>ARIN staff believes the current policy, as ratified, provides sufficient
>direction for lame delegations to be cleaned up.
I agree with the point about the policy but I have submitted an ACSP
item to suggest that lame delegations be managed on a per-zone basis
and not per-network. As this isn't a policy issue (to me) and we
have other proposals that should be hammered out in a month's time, I
don't plan to follow up on this on PPML.
Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468
Think glocally. Act confused.
More information about the ARIN-PPML