[ppml] ARIN commments regarding Lame Delegation Policy

[Owen DeLong]

Nate,
	Could you clarify if you feel that ARIN would be unable to continue  
this
function if section 7 were deleted?

Thanks,

Owen

On Sep 14, 2007, at 7:11 AM, Member Services wrote:

> The following comments are being provided in response to recent
> discussions and questions raised on the ppml.
>
> ARIN has implemented the methodology for identifying lameness as
> described at:
>
>       http://www.arin.net/reference/lame_delegations.html
>
> Using the 208.114.64.0/19 example posted on ppml, each name server  
> would
> be tested for all 32 reverse zones.  A name server would be deemed  
> lame
> only when all zones fail. If one or more of the reverse zones in  
> the /19
> is configured properly for a given name server, the name server
> delegation for that /19 would be declared 'good'.
>
> With regard to lame delegations reported to ARIN by third parties,  
> ARIN
> will not respond to requests to remove these delegations without
> exercising the procedure adopted to implement the lame delegation  
> policy.
>
> ARIN staff believes the current policy, as ratified, provides  
> sufficient
> direction for lame delegations to be cleaned up.
>
> Regards,
>
> Nate Davis
> Chief Operations Officer
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the  
> ARIN Public Policy
> Mailing List (PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml Please contact the ARIN  
> Member Services
> Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues.