[ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-15: Authentication ofLegacyResources - version 1.1

Andrew Dul andrew.dul at quark.net
Sat Sep 1 12:32:46 EDT 2007


At 05:47 PM 8/31/2007 -0400, Keith W. Hare wrote:
> 
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net] On 
>> Behalf Of Scott Leibrand
>> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 4:54 PM
>> To: David Conrad
>> Cc: Public Policy Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-15: Authentication 
>> of Legacy Resources - version 1.1
>> 
>> David Conrad wrote:
>> > On Aug 31, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Member Services wrote:
>> >   
>> >> 1.      Policy Proposal Name: Authentication of Legacy Resources
>> >> No changes shall be made to legacy resource records which are not
>> >> covered by a registration services agreement after 
>> December 31, 2007.
>> >>     
>> >
>> > I suspect that refusal to update registration information 
>> will likely  
>> > not be very popular with folks trying to fight spam, 
>> phishing, fraud,  
>> > etc. It could also have the effect of spurring the 
>> establishment of  
>> > alternative registries that maintain "accurate" information.
>> 
>> Is requiring registrants to sign a contract that codifies 
>> their rights 
>> and responsibilities "refusal"?  I don't see the requirements 
>> here as at 
>> all onerous, and wouldn't see alternate registries as viable.  As an 
>> ISP, if a customer asked me to route space based on the 
>> information in 
>> some alternate registry because they were unwilling to sign 
>> an RSA and 
>> pay ARIN $100/year, I would consider that suspicious enough to have 
>> another abuse scrub run on the customer, and refuse to route 
>> the space.
>
>By the time the RSA for legacy resource holders is available, and ARIN
>starts an outreach to legacy resoure holders, it is going to be
>December, 2007.
>
>How about saying "No changes shall be made to legacy resource records
>which are not covered by a registration services agreement after
>December 31, 2008."

If the date of implementation is a stumbling block, then it certainly can
be changed to accomodate the consensus of the community.

Andrew





More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list