[ppml] Multihome Pro Con Document

[Howard, W. Lee]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net] On 
> Behalf Of Michel Py
>
> 2. Replace BGP with a protocol that does not care about 
> routing table bloat. Memory is cheap; the days that led to 
> the "aggregated" IPv6 design when a 7500/RSP2/128 was the 
> baddest core router one could buy are long gone. Today people 
> are running dual full feeds on a 1800...

My understanding of the problem (I don't work on a default-free
network anymore) is that keeping up with changes is expensive
in CPU, not in memory, and that lookups against a large table
are expensive in latency.

What is the appropriate IETF WG for design of IPv6 multihoming
solutions?  shim6 is a specific solution; v6ops doesn't sound
quite right.  

Lee

> 
> Michel.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
>