[ppml] Policy Proposal 2005-1: Provider-independent IPv6 Assignments for End Sites - Last Call

Matthew Petach mpetach at netflight.com
Thu Apr 20 13:28:29 EDT 2006


On 4/17/06, Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com> wrote:
>
> On 17-apr-2006, at 22:41, David Williamson wrote:
>
> > Oh, and in case it isn't obvious, I'm very much in favor of 2005-1.  I
> > think PI space until such time as it isn't needed (if ever...) is far
> > preferable to nothing deployed and running out of v4 space.  Yes,
> > there's a ways to go before that event, but it's coming soon enough to
> > already look to me like a train wreck.
>
> Question for those of you in favor of the policy proposal:
>
> If you're not ISP / IP carrier:
> Are you planning to obtain an IPv6 PI prefix as per the proposed
> policy and then deploy, say, 25% or more of the services you now
> provide over IPv4 over IPv6 using those addresses? And if so, how
> soon would this happen?


Yes; within the next four years.

(also a vote in support of 2005-1)
Matt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20060420/ef5b2637/attachment.htm>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list