[ppml] Policy Proposal 2005-8: Proposal to amend ARIN IPv6 assignment and utilisation requirement - Last Call
Lea Roberts
lea.roberts at stanford.edu
Tue Apr 18 15:24:11 EDT 2006
hi Izumi!
thanks for the clarification(s). I still have a question below.
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Izumi Okutani wrote:
<snip>
> The current issues in JP are two:
>
> + Some impact over the existing LIRs are noted, expecially in
> terms of expenses(1/2 LIRs face additional expenses of over
> US$85,000).
are these additional expenses one time costs? or do people feel there is
some ongoing cost to dealing with multiple assignment sizes even after
the supporting software is upgraded?
> + Few LIRs LIRs expressed concerns that classless addressing will
> lose the benefit of IPv6 over IPv4.
> i.e, simplicity of network design and service specification
>
<snip>
thanks again, /Lea
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list