[ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv6 HD ratio/ Really public involvment

[McTim]

Hi Ed,

On 5/13/05, Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz> wrote:
> 
> 
> I think one reason there isn't broad input is that fringe players
> like me (and those even further out) have a hard time navigating
> through all of the threads.  Besides misconstrued and mis-attributed
> statements, it's the track of the discussion that is hard to follow.

ACK

> 
> What would be helpful is an active editor of the discussion, someone
> tracking what is said and laying out the discussion for those that
> don't live and breath this stuff.  E.g., I've completely lost the
> meaning of the subject line "IPv6>>32" - and how does this relate to
> a proposed policy?

I think this is a fine idea. It might even help in determining *consensus*. 

Cheers,

McTim
nic-hdl:      TMCG

If you understood what I was saying, you'd now what I was thinking,
maybe...or not