[ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv6 HD ratio/ Really public involvment
dogwallah at gmail.com
Fri May 13 16:02:53 EDT 2005
On 5/13/05, Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz> wrote:
> I think one reason there isn't broad input is that fringe players
> like me (and those even further out) have a hard time navigating
> through all of the threads. Besides misconstrued and mis-attributed
> statements, it's the track of the discussion that is hard to follow.
> What would be helpful is an active editor of the discussion, someone
> tracking what is said and laying out the discussion for those that
> don't live and breath this stuff. E.g., I've completely lost the
> meaning of the subject line "IPv6>>32" - and how does this relate to
> a proposed policy?
I think this is a fine idea. It might even help in determining *consensus*.
If you understood what I was saying, you'd now what I was thinking,
More information about the ARIN-PPML