[ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv6 HD ratio/ Really public involvment

[Azinger, Marla]

We all have our opinions/views and we all need to hear the various opinions/views.

What we all need to keep in mind is ...they are just that...views and opinions...its business...not personal.

I don't always agree with a view/opinion someone may have made...and I might also post a strong opposing view/opinion back to what I didn't agree with.  However, I still value the opinion/view that I don't agree with.  

Even if I don't agree with something it still opens my mind up further to consider the possibility and re-examine what I originally formulated in my brain.

Chip thank you for you comments.  I look forward to reading more in the future.  Even if I might oppose one.  ;o)

Marla
Electric Lightwave

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ppml at arin.net [mailto:owner-ppml at arin.net]On Behalf Of Chip
Mefford
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 10:06 AM
To: Glenn Wiltse; ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv6 HD ratio/ Really public
involvment


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Glenn Wiltse wrote:
|   Oh, come on... please don't get started on a debate of top or bottom
| posting... or posting in between for that matter. It's trivial attacks
| of this nature that detur some more timid folks from posting.
|
| Glenn Wiltse

Glenn,

It was neither an attack, nor trivial. It was a declarative
statement. Such things make threads difficult to follow, and discourge
interjection.

It is difficult to avoid being misconstrued if context
is not kept.

This is a pretty intimidating list as it is. There was
a statement made that implied that things might move
along better if there were more input. I made my
observation.

It seems pretty clear to me, that /right here/ is a good
enough example of me at least, wanting back into lurk
mode most desperately.

I know this is true for me, I can fairly intuit it
is for others also.

This is a high traffic list, I have a day job. I try to read
as much of this list as I can, some threads might go on
for a week or so before I even begin on them.
I'm sure I am not alone.
- --

|
| On Fri, 13 May 2005, Chip Mefford wrote:
|
|
| Azinger, Marla wrote:
| |>From my experience I have found there are a large number of people
| within the Internet Community that read about 75% of these postings.
| They also form an opinion.  However, they refrain from commenting.  Why?
|   I have been told by many..."because you already said what I was
| thinking" or "because I dont like speaking or commenting in public forum
| so I just wait until someone else says what I'm thinking."
|
|
| There are also those of us who might interject something, but since the
| format is a top-posted, jeaporday style thread, it's difficult
| to contribute without being misconstrued.
|
| Please don't top post.

!DSPAM:4284cc0e2341125504042!




| Just so your clear on my posistion, I'll post on both top and bottom.

|   Oh, come on... please don't get started on a debate of top or bottom
| posting... or posting in between for that matter. It's trivial attacks
| of this nature that detur some more timid folks from posting.

| Glenn Wiltse



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFChN6K0STXFHxUucwRAge6AJsE0nb9oTdprWqUJjN8sDufR3YqUQCZAaeT
QhhzkHBBqGs8GAAymP5zpNw=
=Tj9e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----