[ppml] ARIN 2002-3 statistics

[Marshall Eubanks]

Hello;


I basically agree with Jim here

- a year wait seems appropriate. Since the clock started in May, that means late Spring, 2005.

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 16:53:33 -0500
 "Jim McBurnett" <jim at tgasolutions.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > First, doesn't look like a significant impact, but again, it 
> > has only been 6 months...has 'word' gotten out that the 
> > boundary was changed?...I don't know.
> 
> In my part of the world--- 2 service providers and 3 of my customers
> 	did not know.. (all that we asked) One customer currently has 
> 	3 Class C's from 2 providers...(yeah, this is a bad one)
> 	All 3 of those enterprise customers are now considering the
> application.
> 
> > It has been our announced commitment on the AC to revisit 
> > this boundary after impact assessment.
> > 
> > So...to the community this email reaches...
> > 
> > 1.  Has there been sufficient time to devoted to the impact?
> 
> Personnally, I think it should wait 1 calender year.....
> 6 months is barely enough time to consider.
> 
> > 2.  Are the statistics below adequate to assess impact or are 
> > others needed (suggest)?
> 
> I think we should wait, maybe someone on the AC should write
> And article to Network World or something, and start the land rush.
> 
> > 3.  Should the Advisory Council entertain a boundary change 
> > policy proposal for the Spring meeting?
> 
> YES, put it on the calender and then see what the membership and PPML
> says...
> 

Agree

> > 4.  In the event that 4 is answered in the affirmative, is 
> > the boundary change a single or mulitiple bits?..and...who 
> > would be the target for such policy change (e.g. only 
> > multi-homed nets)?
> 
> I think it should be changed to read:
> Multi-homed networks will be assigned /22, /23 or /24 allocations based
> on
> Utilization and needs in-line with other allocations and assignments
> covered in 
> Other policies...
> 

Also agree.

> Thanks,
> Jim
> 
>  
> > Your input to these questions and in other areas you thing 
> > relevant are appreciated.
> > 
> > Bill Darte
> > ARIN Advisory Council
> > 314 935-7575
> 

Regards
Marshall Eubanks