[ppml] ARIN 2002-3 statistics
jim at tgasolutions.com
Mon Nov 15 16:53:33 EST 2004
> First, doesn't look like a significant impact, but again, it
> has only been 6 months...has 'word' gotten out that the
> boundary was changed?...I don't know.
In my part of the world--- 2 service providers and 3 of my customers
did not know.. (all that we asked) One customer currently has
3 Class C's from 2 providers...(yeah, this is a bad one)
All 3 of those enterprise customers are now considering the
> It has been our announced commitment on the AC to revisit
> this boundary after impact assessment.
> So...to the community this email reaches...
> 1. Has there been sufficient time to devoted to the impact?
Personnally, I think it should wait 1 calender year.....
6 months is barely enough time to consider.
> 2. Are the statistics below adequate to assess impact or are
> others needed (suggest)?
I think we should wait, maybe someone on the AC should write
And article to Network World or something, and start the land rush.
> 3. Should the Advisory Council entertain a boundary change
> policy proposal for the Spring meeting?
YES, put it on the calender and then see what the membership and PPML
> 4. In the event that 4 is answered in the affirmative, is
> the boundary change a single or mulitiple bits?..and...who
> would be the target for such policy change (e.g. only
> multi-homed nets)?
I think it should be changed to read:
Multi-homed networks will be assigned /22, /23 or /24 allocations based
Utilization and needs in-line with other allocations and assignments
> Your input to these questions and in other areas you thing
> relevant are appreciated.
> Bill Darte
> ARIN Advisory Council
> 314 935-7575
More information about the ARIN-PPML