[ppml] ARIN 2002-3 statistics

[Bill Darte]

> 
> Bill,
> 	I'd say this does not constitute a land rush, and, it 
> is probably, at this point, worth revisiting the boundary as 
> was consensus when this was adopted.  Do you think we should 
> look at going to /23 or /24 as the next step in this process?

First, doesn't look like a significant impact, but again, it has only been 6
months...has 'word' gotten out that the boundary was changed?...I don't
know.

It has been our announced commitment on the AC to revisit this boundary
after impact assessment.

So...to the community this email reaches...

1.  Has there been sufficient time to devoted to the impact?
2.  Are the statistics below adequate to assess impact or are others needed
(suggest)?
3.  Should the Advisory Council entertain a boundary change policy proposal
for the Spring meeting?
4.  In the event that 4 is answered in the affirmative, is the boundary
change a single or mulitiple bits?..and...who would be the target for such
policy change (e.g. only multi-homed nets)?

Your input to these questions and in other areas you thing relevant are
appreciated.

Bill Darte
ARIN Advisory Council
314 935-7575


> 
> Owen
> 
> 
> --On Monday, November 15, 2004 11:28 AM -0500 Leslie Nobile 
> <leslien at arin.net> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > A recent question has come up on this list regarding the number of 
> > organizations that have qualified for IPv4 addresses under policy 
> > 2002-3 "Address Policy for Multi-homed Networks.
> >
> >
> >
> > Since its implementation in May 2004, ARIN has been tracking the 
> > number of allocations and assignments (/21s and /22s) made 
> under this 
> > policy very closely.  Here are the statistics as of Oct. 31, 2004:
> >
> >
> >
> ># of Organizations qualified:   80
> >
> ># of Allocations to ISPs       61
> >
> ># of Assignments to End Users:  27
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Leslie Nobile
> >
> > Director, Registration Services
> >
> > American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
> >
> > leslie at arin.net
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
>