[ppml] ARIN 2002-3 statistics

[Leo Bicknell]

In a message written on Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 03:10:17PM -0600, Bill Darte wrote:
> 1.  Has there been sufficient time to devoted to the impact?

No.  From recent discussions sprung up from Nanog news of this
change hasn't made it very far at all.  Also, given once someone
knows they can do this they may have to put various ducks in a row
to make it happen I think it is too soon to tell.

> 2.  Are the statistics below adequate to assess impact or are others needed
> (suggest)?

I would like to see month-by-month numbers, so we can attempt to
tell if the rate of requests is still going up, going down, or
remaining steady.  This is a better indicator, IMHO.

If we have month by month numbers for a year showing a trend that is not
sharply increasing towards the end we are probably safe, otherwise, who
knows?

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20041115/3f28d378/attachment.sig>