[ppml] Policy Proposal -- Limit Scope of Anonymous Allocations

[CJ Wittbrodt]

Owen,

I have to say that I don't feel that I should have to do this.  I
am paying my ISP for a service.  That service includes them dealing 
with abuse complaints.  My ISP is very happy to do that for me.  I
don't want my address and phone in the database.  I don't think I should
have to jump through hoops to anonymize my info.  Besides that doesn't at
all help the spam issue anyway.  So we all anonymize ourselves and then
there isn't even an ISP contact.  

Representing only myself here..
---CJ

    From: Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com>
    Subject: Re: [ppml] Policy Proposal -- Limit Scope of Anonymous Allocations 
    --==========BBF1457510A2AAF3C20B==========
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    Content-Disposition: inline
    
    While there may be an extended wait for a P.O. Box at the local post =
    office,
    there are usually alternatives that work just as well.  Most Mailboxes Etc.
    and their ilk have boxes for rent.  Usually if you go to the next nearest
    Post Offices, you can find boxes available.  Finally, there are a number of
    mail forwarding services available which allow you to essentially anonymize
    your address.
    
    Owen
    
    
    
    --On Thursday, November 20, 2003 9:31 PM -0800 CJ Wittbrodt=20
    <cjw at groovy.com> wrote:
    
    >
    > This may be true but in some places it can take close to a year to
    > get one.  I am not kidding, I lived it.   It'd be fun to have to put
    > off getting a connection because of the wait for a PO box..
    >
    > ----CJ
    >
    >     From: J Bacher <jb at jbacher.com>
    >     Subject: Re: [ppml] Policy Proposal -- Limit Scope of Anonymous
    > 	     Allocations
    >     At 11:28 AM 11/19/2003 -0800, you wrote:
    >     >The rich and famous don't need their ISP for privacy.  They would
    > register     >both under some corporation they own with a P.O. Box.
    > Sorry, no sale as     >far as I'm concerned.
    >
    >     One doesn't need to be either rich or famous to use a PO Box.  Unless
    > PO      Boxes in your part of the world are exhorbitantly expensive.
    >
    
    
    
    --=20
    If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
    
    --==========BBF1457510A2AAF3C20B==========
    Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin)
    
    iD8DBQE/vlAan5zKWQ/iqj0RAtKyAJ42tdbRDpt9gr7yXgHklsqPwi13zACeLQqa
    K4zDX+H1jczRb4GvXkdo3ls=
    =SCVg
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    
    --==========BBF1457510A2AAF3C20B==========--