[arin-discuss] ARIN billing practice
tedm at ipinc.net
Mon Sep 21 20:09:30 EDT 2009
John Curran wrote:
> On Sep 21, 2009, at 3:39 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>> Spam may not be a crime in all countries that ARIN has jurisdiction
>> However, please keep in mind ARIN is not above the law.
> Ted -
> We're proactive, not reactive here – ARIN works closely with law
> enforcement organizations in the region to help them understand
> exactly what the records we keep (publicly visible and private in the
> application process) to help support them in their enforcement
John, I did not mean to imply that ARIN did not do this, that was
perhaps a poor choice of wording.
> This turns out to be very important for the criminal investigations
> that are being pursued against parties whose identity is predominantly
> It's important to note that ARIN can easily reclaim IP resources from
> parties that make fraudulent applications to ARIN, but otherwise we
> are not in a position to reclaim resources to a party which is alleged
> of criminal activity. We do investigate each fraud report, but many
> of them do not involve any misrepresentation to ARIN and hence are a
> matter for law enforcement.
Question - if someone on the Internet e-mails ARIN with information that
is verifiable that an address block holder is bogus would ARIN follow it up?
For example, if Joe Spamfighter e-mails all master POCs of a block
holder and they bounce, calls the phone numbers on them and gets a "this
is a disconnected number" goes to a website on it and gets no response
back, then complains to ARIN, would ARIN follow this up?
More information about the ARIN-discuss