[arin-discuss] Food for thought: IPv4 accountability.
Tony Valenti
tony.valenti at powerdnn.com
Tue Jul 21 22:49:53 EDT 2009
I'm in Omaha, Nebraska.
The big thing to us is that as a content provider, we have to serve our
content on a network that is compatible with our customers. If we went IPV6
on our gear, we'd go out of business because all our customers would find a
content provider who would serve it on IPs that they could access.
It is a lot easier to find a new webhost than it is to change ISPs.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Kelvin Williams <kwilliams at altuscgi.com>wrote:
> Net-Neutrality is something I fully support. The previous example was just
> saying, if ARIN can't help us little guys, we can band together and help
> ourselves.
>
> Kelvin Williams
> Altus Communications Group, Inc.
> Office Direct: 678.369.5968
> Office Main: 678.369.5970
> Fax: 866.895.8557
> Mobile: 678.852.4173
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
>
> ------------------------------
> *From*: John Brown
> *Date*: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:39:24 -0600
> *To*: <kwilliams at altuscgi.com>; Chris Gotstein<chris at uplogon.com>
>
> *Subject*: Re: [arin-discuss] Food for thought: IPv4 accountability.
>
> Hang on, I need to scream NET-NEUTRALITY.
>
> Ah, but market forces will keep you from adding those ACL’s. Your
> customers will find another provider that is ACL free and then you will be
> revenue free. :)
>
>
> On 7/21/09 8:30 PM, "Kelvin Williams" <kwilliams at altuscgi.com> wrote:
>
> ARIN may not have the legal right to do anything. But, if they (Apple, et
> al) don't want to play fair with the rest of us, they don't have a legal
> right when we add ACLs blocking their traffic from traversing our networks.
> ;)Kw
>
> Kelvin WilliamsAltus Communications Group, Inc.Office Direct:
> 678.369.5968Office Main: 678.369.5970Fax: 866.895.8557Mobile:
> 678.852.4173Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
>
> ------------------------------
> *From*: John Brown
> *Date*: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:26:02 -0600
> *To*: Chris Gotstein<chris at uplogon.com>; <kwilliams at altuscgi.com>
> *Subject*: Re: [arin-discuss] Food for thought: IPv4 accountability.
> I’ll ask the age old question again.
>
> What legal right does ARIN have to tell Apple to do anything? If Apple
> got the space pre-ARIN and the rules where different then, what gives ARIN
> the ability to enforce rules today.
>
> Its contracts law.
>
>
>
>
> On 7/21/09 8:14 PM, "Chris Gotstein" <chris at uplogon.com> wrote:
>
> I would agree. Us small guys don't want to get to a point where the big
> guys are holding available IP address space over our heads for a fee.
> Those companies aren't just going to start dealing with every small ISP
> that comes along asking for address space.
>
> We've gone through the process of getting our initial IP space and also
> requesting additional IP space. We were successful on both attempts
> because we could prove we needed the space. We also have an IPv6 block
> and already have it implemented on our routers. But at this time, the
> only way you can run IPv6 is dual stack, i don't see us running pure
> IPv6 for a long time to come.
>
> ARIN needs to step in and start dealing with these large, mostly unused
> blocks of IP address space. A working group would be a good start, or
> maybe it's just a matter of asking for justification from each of these
> companies. ARIN has the right to poll current block holders of address
> space on justification, why can't they do the same on these large
> blocks? If HP and Apple can show they are using 80% or more of their
> block, then they can keep it and we move on. If not, then they should
> break up their blocks, and return the un-used space to ARIN.
>
>
> --
> Chris Gotstein
> Sr Network Engineer
> UP Logon/Computer Connection UP
> 500 N Stephenson Ave
> Iron Mountain, MI 49801
> Phone: 906-774-4847
> Fax: 906-774-0335
> chris at uplogon.com
>
> Kelvin Williams wrote:
> > Whoa, whoa, whoa.
> >
> > I'm sure I represent several others facing the depletion of IPv4. Our
> Broadband division services residential and SMB DOCSIS and DSL subscribers.
> >
> > In a perfect world we would be servicing savvy subscribers running Linux
> or current versions of Windows that support IPv6, and the majority of web
> destinations were running IPv6.
> >
> > I can't implement NAT for our subscribers given that NAT can cause
> problems for some of the services (VoIP, VPNs, etc) in use today.
> >
> > So, if I'm reading this right, folks like me who are protecting what
> blocks we manage from excess waste and paying for every block, will now be
> at the mercy of these /8 holders who may be utilizing a tiny portion of the
> blocks they are assigned when the "transfer market" comes into play.
> >
> > Lovely, I can't wait until I'm paying $100 a year per IPv4 address
> because they can go for that.
> >
> > I think instead of talking on these lists that there should be a
> steering group developed to address the real issues. Forcing Apple, HP and
> the DoD to implement IPv6 NOW freeing up those blocks. If they can't, they
> need to pay. In my opinion, especially when looking at the DoD most of their
> networks aren't accessed by the general public, so they can transition
> versus the ISPs of the world dealing with users still running Windows 98.
> >
> > Additionally the group could reallocate those big blocks to the
> responsible little guy with the aforementioned issues without the
> establishment of a transfer market, and work to create a series of large
> bandwidth IPv4 to IPv6 gateways.
> >
> > (All of the above was written after too many beers at the local brew
> pub--if it doesn't make sense to you, it made sense to us)
> >
> >
> > Kw
> >
> >
> > Kelvin Williams
> > Altus Communications Group, Inc.
> > Office Direct: 678.369.5968
> > Office Main: 678.369.5970
> > Fax: 866.895.8557
> > Mobile: 678.852.4173
> >
> > Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm at ipinc.net>
> >
> > Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:58:01
> > To: John Brown<john at citylinkfiber.com>
> > Cc: ARIN Discussion List<arin-discuss at arin.net>
> > Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] Food for thought: IPv4 accountability.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > If people NEED IPv4 after runout (as opposed to merely liking to have
> > some), then a transfer market will
> > exist, and those unused IPv4 numbers of HP and Apple will suddenly
> > have a transferable value - and as long as HP and Apple continue to sit
> > on them, they lose that money. It's no different than charging them
> > a fee to where they then lose money paying the fee. Either way,
> > they lose money. The only difference is who gets the money they lose.
> >
> > Apple and HP only DON'T lose money if a transfer market never forms
> > and that block of numbers never gains value. In which case nobody will
> > be bugging ARIN to start charging them a fee.
> >
> > Either way, it works the same.
> >
> > Ted
> >
> > John Brown wrote:
> >> So the challenge for ARIN, is what legal right do they have to assess a
> >> fee on Apple or HP (to use them as an example here)??
> >>
> >> When Apple or HP got their space in the late 1980's there was no fee as
> >> part of the "contract".
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Steve Wagner [mailto:stwagner at syringanetworks.net]<stwagner at syringanetworks.net]>
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 5:38 PM
> >>> To: John Brown; Mike Horwath; Nathaniel B. Lyon
> >>> Cc: ARIN Discussion List
> >>> Subject: RE: [arin-discuss] Food for thought: IPv4 accountability.
> >>>
> >>> If either Apple or HP corporate network sits behind a NAT
> >>> firewall, they do not need the address space you speak about,
> >>> i.e. 40 million. In this regard may charging those type of
> >>> entities for the address space they use, may result in them
> >>> returning this address space to the allocation pool. This
> >>> would be true for any other end user entity as well that uses
> >>> a NAT type firewall
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Steve Wagner
> >>> Vice President of Operations
> >>> Syringa Networks, LLC
> >>> 3795 S Development Ave, Suite 100
> >>> Boise, ID 83705
> >>> Office: 208.229.6104
> >>> Main: 208.229.6100
> >>> Emergency: 1.800.454.7214
> >>> Fax: 208.229.6110
> >>> Email: Stwagner at syringanetworks.net
> >>> Web: www.syringanetworks.net
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> "Idaho's Premier Fiber Optic Network"
> >>>
> >>> Privilege and Confidentiality Notice
> >>> The information in this message is intended for the named
> >>> recipients only. It may contain information that is
> >>> privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from
> >>> disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
> >>> hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution,
> >>> or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of
> >>> this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> >>> this e-mail in error, do not print it or disseminate it or
> >>> its contents. In such event, please notify the sender by
> >>> return e-mail and delete the e-mail file immediately
> >>> thereafter. Thank you.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net
> >>> [mailto:arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net]<arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net]>On Behalf Of John Brown
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 5:18 PM
> >>> To: Mike Horwath; Nathaniel B. Lyon
> >>> Cc: ARIN Discussion List
> >>> Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] Food for thought: IPv4 accountability.
> >>>
> >>> I think that the other ARIN RIR's do a better job of managing
> >>> the actual
> >>> usage ratios. Lots of US service providers have space allocated or
> >>> assigned to downstream customers and those customers don't exist any
> >>> more.
> >>>
> >>> The cost for provider X to tightly manage their space is
> >>> higher than the
> >>> cost of them just getting new space. So it doesn't happen. I could
> >>> give multiple specific examples, at the risk of putting a public spot
> >>> light on those providers. :|
> >>>
> >>> I believe that the early end user entities that got gobs of
> >>> space should
> >>> return the space they aren't using.
> >>>
> >>> Does Apple Computer really need a /8 ???
> >>> Does HP really need a /8 ??
> >>>
> >>> Do both of those entities really need 40 million+ IP addresses ??
> >>>
> >>> For the specific issue of why Mr. Horwath can't get space, I
> >>> don't know.
> >>> He fails to articulate specifics and only talks with a broad brush.
> >>>
> >>> I do know the ARIN staff and they are reasonable people doing
> >>> good work
> >>> under the guidelines they have.
> >>>
> >>> If there is some injustice on Mr. Horwath's allocation
> >>> request, I'm sure
> >>> it can be resolved.
> >>>
> >>> So to that end I'll offer a few minutes of my time to privately work
> >>> with him on his allocation request and see if it passes
> >>> muster and what
> >>> may need to be done to help it float.
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net
> >>>> [mailto:arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net]<arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net]>On Behalf Of Mike Horwath
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 3:48 PM
> >>>> To: Nathaniel B. Lyon
> >>>> Cc: ARIN Discussion List
> >>>> Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] Food for thought: IPv4 accountability.
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi.
> >>>>
> >>>> This issue and scare of IPv4 going away, running out of
> >>>> space, I hear rice cakes are tasty - has been going on for
> >>>> way too long.
> >>>>
> >>>> I started my first ISP in 1993 and was told then that I
> >>>> needed to be stingy with my allocation. 16 years later, same
> >>>> mantra, same boys with their toys who don't want to share the pool.
> >>>>
> >>>> The issues of accountability go back to the mid/late-1990s
> >>>> when it was posed that companies/institutions/government be
> >>>> held to the same standards as joe schmoe consumer of
> >>>> netblocks. Search the mailing list archives, I am sure you
> >>>> will find commentary in regular spats.
> >>>>
> >>>> This isn't going to change, unfortunately.
> >>>>
> >>>> The old boys club is just that: a club of old boys who have
> >>>> benefits for themselves. They even have a sign on their
> >>>> clubhouse that states 'No Girlz'. (the rest of us are the
> >>>> girlz if that wasn't obvious)
> >>>>
> >>>> BUT: you too can join the club: just rewind time by about 20
> >>>> years, get in on the ground floor 'IP Address Give Away'
> >>>> stock offering.
> >>>>
> >>>> Or do what others do, buy larger netblock holding companies: PROFIT
> >>>>
> >>>> If I sound a little bitter, I apologize. The playing field
> >>>> should be level when it comes to this resource. It never has
> >>>> been. I don't think it ever will be.
> >>>>
> >>>> I said it, you read it, I can't take it back.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! drechsau at iphouse.net
> >>>> The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is
> >>>> that surrounds universes. - Berkely Fortune
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>> ARIN-Discuss
> >>>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> >>>> the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
> >>>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> >>>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
> >>>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> >>>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>> ARIN-Discuss
> >>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> >>> the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
> >>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> >>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
> >>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> >>>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >> ARIN-Discuss
> >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> >> the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
> >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> >> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
> >> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> > ARIN-Discuss
> > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> > the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
> > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
> > Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> >_______________________________________________
> > ARIN-Discuss
> > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> > the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
> > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
> > Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-Discuss
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-Discuss
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-discuss/attachments/20090721/95e4f72b/attachment.html>
More information about the ARIN-discuss
mailing list