[arin-discuss] Food for thought: IPv4 accountability.
John Brown
john at citylinkfiber.com
Tue Jul 21 22:45:26 EDT 2009
BTDT. Didn¹t work well.
ARIN is in a specific legal brier-patch. They can¹t tell you what to do
with your routing table, or anyone elses. That could trigger anti-trust
issues.
On 7/21/09 8:43 PM, "Kelvin Williams" <kwilliams at altuscgi.com> wrote:
> Net-Neutrality is something I fully support. The previous example was just
> saying, if ARIN can't help us little guys, we can band together and help
> ourselves.
>
> Kelvin WilliamsAltus Communications Group, Inc.Office Direct:
> 678.369.5968Office Main: 678.369.5970Fax: 866.895.8557Mobile: 678.852.4173Sent
> from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
>
>
> From: John Brown
> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:39:24 -0600
> To: <kwilliams at altuscgi.com>; Chris Gotstein<chris at uplogon.com>
> Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] Food for thought: IPv4 accountability.
> Hang on, I need to scream NET-NEUTRALITY.
>
> Ah, but market forces will keep you from adding those ACL¹s. Your customers
> will find another provider that is ACL free and then you will be revenue free.
> :)
>
>
> On 7/21/09 8:30 PM, "Kelvin Williams" <kwilliams at altuscgi.com> wrote:
>
>> ARIN may not have the legal right to do anything. But, if they (Apple, et al)
>> don't want to play fair with the rest of us, they don't have a legal right
>> when we add ACLs blocking their traffic from traversing our networks. ;)Kw
>>
>> Kelvin WilliamsAltus Communications Group, Inc.Office Direct:
>> 678.369.5968Office Main: 678.369.5970Fax: 866.895.8557Mobile:
>> 678.852.4173Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
>>
>>
>> From: John Brown
>> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:26:02 -0600
>> To: Chris Gotstein<chris at uplogon.com>; <kwilliams at altuscgi.com>
>> Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] Food for thought: IPv4 accountability.
>> I¹ll ask the age old question again.
>>
>> What legal right does ARIN have to tell Apple to do anything? If Apple got
>> the space pre-ARIN and the rules where different then, what gives ARIN the
>> ability to enforce rules today.
>>
>> Its contracts law.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/21/09 8:14 PM, "Chris Gotstein" <chris at uplogon.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I would agree. Us small guys don't want to get to a point where the big
>>> guys are holding available IP address space over our heads for a fee.
>>> Those companies aren't just going to start dealing with every small ISP
>>> that comes along asking for address space.
>>>
>>> We've gone through the process of getting our initial IP space and also
>>> requesting additional IP space. We were successful on both attempts
>>> because we could prove we needed the space. We also have an IPv6 block
>>> and already have it implemented on our routers. But at this time, the
>>> only way you can run IPv6 is dual stack, i don't see us running pure
>>> IPv6 for a long time to come.
>>>
>>> ARIN needs to step in and start dealing with these large, mostly unused
>>> blocks of IP address space. A working group would be a good start, or
>>> maybe it's just a matter of asking for justification from each of these
>>> companies. ARIN has the right to poll current block holders of address
>>> space on justification, why can't they do the same on these large
>>> blocks? If HP and Apple can show they are using 80% or more of their
>>> block, then they can keep it and we move on. If not, then they should
>>> break up their blocks, and return the un-used space to ARIN.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Chris Gotstein
>>> Sr Network Engineer
>>> UP Logon/Computer Connection UP
>>> 500 N Stephenson Ave
>>> Iron Mountain, MI 49801
>>> Phone: 906-774-4847
>>> Fax: 906-774-0335
>>> chris at uplogon.com
>>>
>>> Kelvin Williams wrote:
>>>> > Whoa, whoa, whoa.
>>>> >
>>>> > I'm sure I represent several others facing the depletion of IPv4. Our
>>>> Broadband division services residential and SMB DOCSIS and DSL subscribers.
>>>> >
>>>> > In a perfect world we would be servicing savvy subscribers running
>>>> Linux or current versions of Windows that support IPv6, and the majority of
>>>> web destinations were running IPv6.
>>>> >
>>>> > I can't implement NAT for our subscribers given that NAT can cause
>>>> problems for some of the services (VoIP, VPNs, etc) in use today.
>>>> >
>>>> > So, if I'm reading this right, folks like me who are protecting what
>>>> blocks we manage from excess waste and paying for every block, will now be
>>>> at the mercy of these /8 holders who may be utilizing a tiny portion of the
>>>> blocks they are assigned when the "transfer market" comes into play.
>>>> >
>>>> > Lovely, I can't wait until I'm paying $100 a year per IPv4 address
>>>> because they can go for that.
>>>> >
>>>> > I think instead of talking on these lists that there should be a
>>>> steering group developed to address the real issues. Forcing Apple, HP and
>>>> the DoD to implement IPv6 NOW freeing up those blocks. If they can't, they
>>>> need to pay. In my opinion, especially when looking at the DoD most of
>>>> their networks aren't accessed by the general public, so they can
>>>> transition versus the ISPs of the world dealing with users still running
>>>> Windows 98.
>>>> >
>>>> > Additionally the group could reallocate those big blocks to the
>>>> responsible little guy with the aforementioned issues without the
>>>> establishment of a transfer market, and work to create a series of large
>>>> bandwidth IPv4 to IPv6 gateways.
>>>> >
>>>> > (All of the above was written after too many beers at the local brew
>>>> pub--if it doesn't make sense to you, it made sense to us)
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Kw
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Kelvin Williams
>>>> > Altus Communications Group, Inc.
>>>> > Office Direct: 678.369.5968
>>>> > Office Main: 678.369.5970
>>>> > Fax: 866.895.8557
>>>> > Mobile: 678.852.4173
>>>> >
>>>> > Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>>> > From: Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm at ipinc.net>
>>>> >
>>>> > Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:58:01
>>>> > To: John Brown<john at citylinkfiber.com>
>>>> > Cc: ARIN Discussion List<arin-discuss at arin.net>
>>>> > Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] Food for thought: IPv4 accountability.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > If people NEED IPv4 after runout (as opposed to merely liking to have
>>>> > some), then a transfer market will
>>>> > exist, and those unused IPv4 numbers of HP and Apple will suddenly
>>>> > have a transferable value - and as long as HP and Apple continue to sit
>>>> > on them, they lose that money. It's no different than charging them
>>>> > a fee to where they then lose money paying the fee. Either way,
>>>> > they lose money. The only difference is who gets the money they lose.
>>>> >
>>>> > Apple and HP only DON'T lose money if a transfer market never forms
>>>> > and that block of numbers never gains value. In which case nobody will
>>>> > be bugging ARIN to start charging them a fee.
>>>> >
>>>> > Either way, it works the same.
>>>> >
>>>> > Ted
>>>> >
>>>> > John Brown wrote:
>>>>> >> So the challenge for ARIN, is what legal right do they have to assess
a
>>>>> >> fee on Apple or HP (to use them as an example here)??
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> When Apple or HP got their space in the late 1980's there was no fee
as
>>>>> >> part of the "contract".
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> >>> From: Steve Wagner [mailto:stwagner at syringanetworks.net]
>>>>>> >>> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 5:38 PM
>>>>>> >>> To: John Brown; Mike Horwath; Nathaniel B. Lyon
>>>>>> >>> Cc: ARIN Discussion List
>>>>>> >>> Subject: RE: [arin-discuss] Food for thought: IPv4 accountability.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> If either Apple or HP corporate network sits behind a NAT
>>>>>> >>> firewall, they do not need the address space you speak about,
>>>>>> >>> i.e. 40 million. In this regard may charging those type of
>>>>>> >>> entities for the address space they use, may result in them
>>>>>> >>> returning this address space to the allocation pool. This
>>>>>> >>> would be true for any other end user entity as well that uses
>>>>>> >>> a NAT type firewall
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> Regards,
>>>>>> >>> Steve Wagner
>>>>>> >>> Vice President of Operations
>>>>>> >>> Syringa Networks, LLC
>>>>>> >>> 3795 S Development Ave, Suite 100
>>>>>> >>> Boise, ID 83705
>>>>>> >>> Office: 208.229.6104
>>>>>> >>> Main: 208.229.6100
>>>>>> >>> Emergency: 1.800.454.7214
>>>>>> >>> Fax: 208.229.6110
>>>>>> >>> Email: Stwagner at syringanetworks.net
>>>>>> >>> Web: www.syringanetworks.net
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> "Idaho's Premier Fiber Optic Network"
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> Privilege and Confidentiality Notice
>>>>>> >>> The information in this message is intended for the named
>>>>>> >>> recipients only. It may contain information that is
>>>>>> >>> privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from
>>>>>> >>> disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
>>>>>> >>> hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution,
>>>>>> >>> or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of
>>>>>> >>> this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received
>>>>>> >>> this e-mail in error, do not print it or disseminate it or
>>>>>> >>> its contents. In such event, please notify the sender by
>>>>>> >>> return e-mail and delete the e-mail file immediately
>>>>>> >>> thereafter. Thank you.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> >>> From: arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net
>>>>>> >>> [mailto:arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of John Brown
>>>>>> >>> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 5:18 PM
>>>>>> >>> To: Mike Horwath; Nathaniel B. Lyon
>>>>>> >>> Cc: ARIN Discussion List
>>>>>> >>> Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] Food for thought: IPv4 accountability.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> I think that the other ARIN RIR's do a better job of managing
>>>>>> >>> the actual
>>>>>> >>> usage ratios. Lots of US service providers have space allocated or
>>>>>> >>> assigned to downstream customers and those customers don't exist
any
>>>>>> >>> more.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> The cost for provider X to tightly manage their space is
>>>>>> >>> higher than the
>>>>>> >>> cost of them just getting new space. So it doesn't happen. I
could
>>>>>> >>> give multiple specific examples, at the risk of putting a public
spot
>>>>>> >>> light on those providers. :|
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> I believe that the early end user entities that got gobs of
>>>>>> >>> space should
>>>>>> >>> return the space they aren't using.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> Does Apple Computer really need a /8 ???
>>>>>> >>> Does HP really need a /8 ??
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> Do both of those entities really need 40 million+ IP addresses ??
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> For the specific issue of why Mr. Horwath can't get space, I
>>>>>> >>> don't know.
>>>>>> >>> He fails to articulate specifics and only talks with a broad brush.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> I do know the ARIN staff and they are reasonable people doing
>>>>>> >>> good work
>>>>>> >>> under the guidelines they have.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> If there is some injustice on Mr. Horwath's allocation
>>>>>> >>> request, I'm sure
>>>>>> >>> it can be resolved.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> So to that end I'll offer a few minutes of my time to privately
work
>>>>>> >>> with him on his allocation request and see if it passes
>>>>>> >>> muster and what
>>>>>> >>> may need to be done to help it float.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> >>>> From: arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net
>>>>>>> >>>> [mailto:arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Mike Horwath
>>>>>>> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 3:48 PM
>>>>>>> >>>> To: Nathaniel B. Lyon
>>>>>>> >>>> Cc: ARIN Discussion List
>>>>>>> >>>> Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] Food for thought: IPv4
>>>>>>> accountability.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> Hi.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> This issue and scare of IPv4 going away, running out of
>>>>>>> >>>> space, I hear rice cakes are tasty - has been going on for
>>>>>>> >>>> way too long.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> I started my first ISP in 1993 and was told then that I
>>>>>>> >>>> needed to be stingy with my allocation. 16 years later, same
>>>>>>> >>>> mantra, same boys with their toys who don't want to share the
pool.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> The issues of accountability go back to the mid/late-1990s
>>>>>>> >>>> when it was posed that companies/institutions/government be
>>>>>>> >>>> held to the same standards as joe schmoe consumer of
>>>>>>> >>>> netblocks. Search the mailing list archives, I am sure you
>>>>>>> >>>> will find commentary in regular spats.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> This isn't going to change, unfortunately.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> The old boys club is just that: a club of old boys who have
>>>>>>> >>>> benefits for themselves. They even have a sign on their
>>>>>>> >>>> clubhouse that states 'No Girlz'. (the rest of us are the
>>>>>>> >>>> girlz if that wasn't obvious)
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> BUT: you too can join the club: just rewind time by about 20
>>>>>>> >>>> years, get in on the ground floor 'IP Address Give Away'
>>>>>>> >>>> stock offering.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> Or do what others do, buy larger netblock holding companies:
PROFIT
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> If I sound a little bitter, I apologize. The playing field
>>>>>>> >>>> should be level when it comes to this resource. It never has
>>>>>>> >>>> been. I don't think it ever will be.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> I said it, you read it, I can't take it back.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> --
>>>>>>> >>>> Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home!
>>>>>>> drechsau at iphouse.net
>>>>>>> >>>> The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is
>>>>>>> >>>> that surrounds universes. - Berkely Fortune
>>>>>>> >>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>> >>>> ARIN-Discuss
>>>>>>> >>>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>>>>>>> >>>> the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
>>>>>>> >>>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>>>>>>> >>>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
>>>>>>> >>>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>> >>> ARIN-Discuss
>>>>>> >>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>>>>>> >>> the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
>>>>>> >>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>>>>>> >>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
>>>>>> >>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>_______________________________________________
>>>>> >> ARIN-Discuss
>>>>> >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>>>>> >> the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
>>>>> >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>>>>> >> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
>>>>> >> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>>>> >
>>>> >_______________________________________________
>>>> > ARIN-Discuss
>>>> > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>>>> > the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
>>>> > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>>>> > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
>>>> > Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>>>> >_______________________________________________
>>>> > ARIN-Discuss
>>>> > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>>>> > the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
>>>> > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>>>> > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
>>>> > Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ARIN-Discuss
>>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>>> the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
>>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
>>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-discuss/attachments/20090721/ad9c7255/attachment.html>
More information about the ARIN-discuss
mailing list