[arin-discuss] [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?

[Daniel Ruiz]

unsubscribe

 

Daniel Ruiz

Senior Telecommunications Engineer

Anillo Networks, Inc.

655 S. Flower St. Suite 312

Los Angeles, CA 90017

(800) 544-0198

 

 

This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete
this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be
secured or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
destroyed, received late or incomplete, or could contain viruses. The sender
therefore does not accept liability for any error or omission in the
contents of this message, which arises as a result of e-mail transmission.
If verification is required, please request a hard-copy version from the
sender.

 

From: arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net]
On Behalf Of Michael - FullControl Network
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 9:16 AM
To: arin-discuss at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?

 

unsubscribe

 

 

From: arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net]
On Behalf Of Edward Lewis
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 10:32 AM
To: arin-discuss at arin.net
Cc: ed.lewis at neustar.biz
Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?

 

At 11:15 -0400 10/8/07, Dean Anderson wrote:

 

>Except Legacy's aren't lacking an agreement.  You have paper records of
>these agreements with the government. Do you mean to deny the fact that
>the Legacy's have an agreement with the government that ARIN is

>obligated to honor?

 

Quoting: http://www.arin.net/meetings/minutes/ARIN_XIX/ppm1_transcript.html

 

"MR. RYAN: Well, from a legal perspective, this is why I love you guys. I
have never seen the United States government give away anything without any
strings attached before. And so there's a real question in my mind whether
-- with regard to some of the legacy address holders who received early
addresses who were in the Defense or academic community but held Defense
contracts, whether the issuance of space at that time was pursuant to
traditional government theories of government-furnished material or
government-furnished equipment. The paper record is really pretty strange
when one looks at it. And it does appear -- to the extent that I've had an
opportunity to look at some of the paperwork -- that it's one of the few
times in the history of governments that they gave away something seemingly
without a clear set of strings attached to it. ..."

 

-- 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                                +1-571-434-5468
NeuStar

 

Think glocally.  Act confused.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-discuss/attachments/20071008/bf7a7c85/attachment.html>