drechsau at geeks.org
Thu Sep 14 11:41:18 EDT 2000
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 02:45:14PM +0000, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> > > These two statements are inconsistant. "reclaiming" space
> > > may affect the business of the parties that have been delegated
> > > space. To quote Mike Horwath; "...is just not nice..."
> > I say cool, let's conserve *where we can*. In return I want ARIN to
> > go to the people who were given allocations before the big IP scare of
> > the mid nineties that should have never ever been given out and relaim
> > said space to ease this issue of 'we are running out of IPs'.
> "... should have never ever been given out..."
> Hindsight is 20/20. These delegation predate CIDR
> and the addressing "scare" of the mid-90's. And
> several of the "egregious" delegations predate the
> existance of the A/B/C formats and the address "scare"
> of the mid-80's.
I agree that hindsight is 20/20 and I know about when these
delegations were made.
> You are correct in some things though. We must conserve
> where we can; e.g. manage the assets that each of us,
> individually, have been delegated. But it "... is just not
> nice..." to tell others how to manage their assets.
They are no longer assets. At one time it was a big deal to get
addressing, now adays it is a fight.
> Remember, the scarce resource is -NOT- the IP address, its
> the routing table slots that hold the prefixes.
Yep, I know.
Can address space be 'given' to someone else yet? I am due for
another allocation, I have a customer with a large block. Is it okay
for me to trade them a /22 in return for their /16?
Mike Horwath IRC: Drechsau drechsau at Geeks.ORG
Home: 763-540-6815 1901 Sumter Ave N, Golden Valley, MN 55427
Opinions stated in this message, or any message posted by myself
through my Geeks.ORG address, are mine and mine alone, period.
More information about the ARIN-discuss