[ARIN-consult] Community Consultation on CKN23-ARIN Now Open
William Herrin
bill at herrin.us
Thu Mar 30 12:55:11 EDT 2017
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 12:15 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 30 Mar 2017, at 12:00 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:53 AM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
>
>> Does this answer your question, or did I miss it?
>>
>
> Thanks John,
>
> You answered part of it: as long as the POCs have been maintained with
> reachable email, phone and postal addresses, all is well.
>
> What happens if the POC falls out of date and line 5b (or 4b as it was on
> some versions) on the original registration was essentially a fictitious
> name which served as an alias for the individual making the registration?
> Cases where the 5b name does not and never did exist as an independent
> legal entity? Or as Steven described, a like-named organization exists
> today but did not then and has no connection to the number resource?
>
>
> They are the problematic cases, as we definitely do not want to deprive
> the original registrant
> (or their legal successor) of rights to their number resources, but must
> take great care to avoid
> facilitating a party which looks quite similar from posing as the original
> registrant and hijacking
> those same rights.
>
> In those situations, how does ARIN go about making the determination that
> the guy presenting himself is the guy who registered the resources, is in
> actual fact the registrant and has the authority to make updates?
>
>
> Very carefully…
>
> (Apologies for not getting into more detail, but by definition such
> information would provide a
> playbook for those who have nefarious intent.)
>
>
Thanks John. You answered my underlying question which is that ARIN
addresses and will continue to address these situations in the registrant's
favor regardless of what happens with the CKN23-ARIN handle.
Regarding the question the consultation asks, I lean towards option 3, but
I don't think it's appropriate to present an abuse POC that ARIN deems
unvalidated. You're sorta signing people up for unsolicited email for which
they don't necessarily have a simple way to opt out let alone opt in.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20170330/255c61ee/attachment.html>
More information about the ARIN-consult
mailing list