An idea to bounce off people: storing routing info in the DNS instead of the routers.
Jeff Williams
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Fri Jul 18 15:38:51 EDT 1997
- Previous message: An idea to bounce off people: storing routing info in the DNS instead of the routers.
- Next message: Rebuttal to Mr. Weisberg's insinuations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael, Michael Gersten wrote: > > Here's an idea that I wanted to bounce off people, a way to extend > IPv4, reduce the size of the routing tables used by the routers, > enable /31's to be published (are /32's even legal? If so, them too), > and solve the complaint that people have of only ARIN issuing IP > numbers (with no clear idea of what numbers or what criteria) by > allowing anyone with extra IP's to act as an assigner of IP's. > > The general assumptions are: > 1. CIDR table reduction is blocked by non-collapsable entries (I.e, > there's a lot of different published routes going through each > backbone provider, which can never be collapsed without major > renumbering) > 2. Multihomed network entries are not a large component of the > routing tables (A multihomed network: Any backbone that connects > to two or more interconnection points, or any ISP that connects to > two or more backbones, or any network that connects to two or > more ISPs), > 3. A new version of VJ-header compression can be written to deal > with loose source routes in the headers (on the assumption that 99% > of the loose source routes will be the same as the last one, just like > the current assumption that 99% of the packets will go to the same > place as the last packet), > 4. Routers either (A) do not mind loose source routes in packets > going through them, or (B) can have their software modified so that > loose source routes, if "unchanged" (see 3 above), are essentially the > same as destination addresses, > 5. People will (can be forced to) update their DNS entries if the > alternative is no packets will reach them (for the average dialup user > this is a do-nothing -- their ISP will update the ISP's DNS entries if > the ISP changes its backbone provider), > 6. Someone else can solve the DNS security issues (:-) > 7. All "major" routers -- those used by sprint, MCI, etc, can get > software updates within about 6 months or less, > 8. (The Big One): IP v4 has a router redirect message that can > specify a loose source route to use, not just a single host to use, and > that most vendor's ship an IP stack that accepts this message > correctly, > 9. Adding a new DNS RR to the v4 DNS isn't difficult (will live in the > in-addr.arpa domain, just like the PTR record does now) > > Before I send off the idea, I wanted to get people's comments on > these assumptions, especially #8. (Some of you may already see > what I'm saying here). > > Note on #6: Right now I can find rfc's describing RIP, and how > routing used to work in the internet. I know that things are not the > same as they used to be, and that there's a lot of security in the > routing protocols now, but I do not know which rfc's describe the > current situation. I also understand that the DNS system can be > easily lied to, so security is a real concern on this. This seems to be a very workable idea. I think the RFC's you are looking for are RFC 2050 and RFC 1918 and Rfc 1917. (Sorry to all the "ands") >;) As to you concern reguarding regarding #8, I don't see this as a major concern right now. Should be possibility at least. Question: Have you considered submitting this to the ARIN folks through channels or Ripe perhaps? Might be worth a shot. Over all I like this suggestion. Solves alot of problems possibly and takes the political aspect and put's it on the back burner. But it might not fly with the InterNic/IANA/ARIN folks for just that reason. > > Michael > p.s. I apologize if these are not the appropriate lists; they are the > most appropriate ones I know of. > -- > Michael Gersten michael at stb.info.com http://www.stb.info.com/~michael > NeXT Registered Developer (NeRD) # 3860 > Without Prejudice, UCC 1-207 > ** HIRE ME: http://www.stb.info.com/~michael/work/ Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java Development Eng. Information Eng. Group. IEG. INC. Phone :913-294-2375 (v-office) E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
- Previous message: An idea to bounce off people: storing routing info in the DNS instead of the routers.
- Next message: Rebuttal to Mr. Weisberg's insinuations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list