[ppml] Metric for rejecting policy proposals: AC candidate question
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Sat Oct 7 00:38:08 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] Metric for rejecting policy proposals: AC candidate question
- Next message: [ppml] Metric for rejecting policy proposals: AC candidate question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
heather skanks wrote: > I feel the need to pre-emptively clarify and say, that it is not my > intent to say that this draft will or will not become and RFC. Rather > that, Geoff being involved with both the proposed policy AND the RFC > does not add anything to the speed or odds that this will become an RFC, > as I doubt that the policy being passed by the RIR's will affect the RFC > process. luckily, our routers don't care. the ietf stopped being relevant a long time ago. stop using it as an excuse to make delivering packets to my customers harder. randy
- Previous message: [ppml] Metric for rejecting policy proposals: AC candidate question
- Next message: [ppml] Metric for rejecting policy proposals: AC candidate question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list