[arin-discuss] Legacy RSA
Dean Anderson
dean at av8.net
Tue Nov 6 11:22:36 EST 2007
- Previous message: [arin-discuss] Legacy RSA
- Next message: [arin-discuss] Legacy RSA
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Howard, W. Lee wrote: > > That is why it's important to have regular audits of these groups. > > I would challenge you to investigate this, obtain and read the > > auditors report and see what they had to say. > > The auditor's report is available at > http://www.arin.net/about_us/corp_docs/annual_rprt.html Enron, Worldcom, etc all had audits, too. The classification and justification of expenses is disputed here. The audit _after_ these disputes are resolved is the one that will be important. An auditor can only look at the purported justification written on the paperwork given for the expense and decide whether the purported justification would be a valid expense in the category listed. They cannot easilly detect if the justification is actually legitimate and true. An auditor can't tell if going to VON is a legitimate educational outreach effort or a junket. They can't tell if transferring $50k to Nanog is a legitimate educational outreach expense, or an improper transfer to Board Member special interests. Auditors don't investigate the interests of the Board Members. So, an audit doesn't mean that the purported justifications and classifications are _actually_ valid. An audit just means that, on the face of it, the justifications seemed valid. --Dean -- Av8 Internet Prepared to pay a premium for better service? www.av8.net faster, more reliable, better service 617 344 9000
- Previous message: [arin-discuss] Legacy RSA
- Next message: [arin-discuss] Legacy RSA
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ARIN-discuss mailing list