ARIN Justified...

Justin W. Newton justin at gid.net
Wed Jan 10 12:22:05 EST 2001


The challenge of course is that when they were allocated the space, 
current allocation policies were not in place, nor was a policy 
saying that the rules could be changed later, hence there is serious 
legal question over whether or not the rules can be changed after the 
fact.


At 6:49 PM -0800 1/9/01, Clayton Lambert wrote:
>As a person involved with a company that never had a /8 given to it...I say
>it isn't that difficult...They back it up, or they lose it...Point.
>
>Clayton Lambert
>Compliance Services Director,
>Exodus Communications
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alec H. Peterson [mailto:ahp at hilander.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 6:46 PM
>To: Clayton Lambert
>Cc: 'Jim Macknik'; vwp at arin.net
>Subject: Re: ARIN Justified...
>
>
>Clayton Lambert wrote:
>>
>>  I think that companies with /8's and multiple unjustified /16's should
>have
>>  to provide supporting documentation to keep them.
>
>This is a tough issue that we have often come back to.  Unfortunately, we
>have yet to come up with a good answer...
>
>Alec
>
>--
>Alec H. Peterson - ahp at hilander.com
>Staff Scientist
>CenterGate Research Group - http://www.centergate.com
>"Technology so advanced, even _we_ don't understand it!"

-- 

Justin W. Newton
Senior Director, Networking and Telecommunications
NetZero, Inc.



More information about the Vwp mailing list