Last Call for Comment on New IPv6 Policy

[J. Scott Marcus]

>> 3) The authors are revising the document to reflect some important
>> understandings about responsibility for administration of the bits to the
>> left of the /48 dividing line, consistent with presentations made to the
>> ARIN Public Policy meeting.  This draft does not reflect those changes.
>
>	The proposed changes are significant enough that it obscures 
>	the inital premise, i.e. /48 is a good first cut. The IESG
>	proposal is not based on operational experience but is a rough
>	draft of what might be reasonable, after the experiences w/ the
>	/48 have been collected. I beleive that we should consider the
>	new IESG proposal in the 3rd or 4th quarter of this year...
>	AFTER we get the first policy in play.


The new draft is not expected to differ from the old in setting the
dividing line at /48.