silence is consent ......Re: Closure?

[Jim Fleming]

"silence is consent" ....???

Once someone has a unique, persistent, 32-bit "site id", they can
use FREE IPv8 addressing...which is compatible with IPv6....and can
be routed across the legacy IPv4 transport...in the short run...

...silence may mean that people are busy routing around the
fees, taxes, etc. of the government-backed IPv4 implosion...

Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com
Mars 128n 128e
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp


----- Original Message -----
From: <bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com>
To: <v6wg at arin.net>
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 10:14 AM
Subject: Closure?


>
> Good morning folks.
>
> This is to remind you that ARIN is still holding out on accepting the
> IAB/IESG recommendations for inital IPv6 delegation/allocation sizes.
There
> was some lively discussion at the last mtg but the concerns generally came
> down to... "this makes me nervous and I don't understand it all to well."
> Yes, there are operational concerns but quite frankly, the number of
people
> in the ARIN region that are able/willing to explore IPv6 seems to be
either
> very small, not willing to share experiences, or are happy with the 6bone
> delegations.  ARIN has pretty much removed the barriers to entry with the
> zero-cost delegation policy in place.
>
> Unless a viable counter proposal or modification to the existing
> IAB/IESG proposal that has been accepted by RIPE and APNIC, I'm going
> to recommend to the ARIN council that silence is consent and ARIN should
> adopt the IAB/IESG proposal for a /48 being the default delegation size,
> subject to review, based on operational experience.
>
> --bill
>