Reject the NAIPR

Paul Ferguson pferguso at cisco.com
Sat Jan 18 22:27:23 EST 1997


At 09:03 PM 1/18/97 -0600, Brett L. Hawn wrote:

>
>How can anyone help when every reasonable idea that has been proposed was
>either attacked as being 'fearful and conspiracy bound' or ignored by people
>just like you. To this date we still have not seen Kim Hubbard (or anyone
>else for that matter) justify the self perpetuating BoT, or even state that
>they were wrong and are thinking up a new method. How hard can it be to say
>'hey, we made a mistake, we're fixing it' or 'hey, f*ck you, we're the ones
>doing this and you're just SOL', at least then we'd have a damn answer, one
>way or the other.
>

As Kim pointed out earlier, she is planning on placing an updated copy
of the draft on the web site next week for review.

- paul



More information about the Naipr mailing list