[Iana-transition] NRO Proposal for consolidation of RIR regional inputs into single ICG response

[Travis Biehn]

Hey John,

I only take exception with the lack of definition around what a
non-RIR-staff appointee is. Is this a true impartial 3rd party? A community
member? The NRO leaves it up to RIRs to delegate these individuals -
'colluding' RIR staff and non RIR staff are so permitted.

If a RIR is to agree to a 2/3rds majority vote, then potentials for
collusion should be minimized by more explicit terms for appointees to the
'CRISP Team.'

-Travis

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:53 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:

> Folks -
>
> The NRO has issued the following proposal for a process to finalise the
> transition proposal
> from the numbering community.
>
>  <
> https://www.nro.net/nro-and-internet-governance/iana-oversight/consolidated-rir-iana-stewardship-proposal-team-crisp-team
> >
>
> The proposed CRISP team will include 3 members from each region (2
> community members
> and 1 RIR staff per region.)
>
> Discussion on this list of the NRO proposal is welcome.
>
> Thanks!
> /John
>
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> ARIN
>
> _______________________________________________
> Iana-transition mailing list
> Iana-transition at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-transition
>



-- 
Twitter <https://twitter.com/tbiehn> | LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn> | GitHub <http://github.com/tbiehn>
| TravisBiehn.com <http://www.travisbiehn.com> | Google Plus
<https://plus.google.com/+TravisBiehn>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/iana-transition/attachments/20141016/f500715c/attachment.html>