phone types

[Alex Kamantauskas]

 Would there be fields for other devices?  Cell phones, etc?  

On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, ginny listman wrote:

> Of course this would be an optional field.  Maintaining current page phone
> number, as with other phone number and mailboxes would be the POC's
> responsibility.  If you feel keeping up with current page number requires
> too much maintainence, opt not to provide it.
> 
> The only reason I ask the question is that a number of phone fields that
> are designate to be Commercial Phone are listed as (123) 456-7890 (Pager).
> I'm looking to clean-up the database, and one thing I would like to
> enforce is that phone numbers consist of the following: 01234567890+-()
> 
> In the future, if you fill out the phone line with something like:
> 1-543.433.8765 (this is my pager)
> what gets store in the database, and displayed in whois:
> (543) 433-8765
> Well at least for those phone number in the US.  Other country phone
> numbers would be stored as entered.  Just working on uniformity.
> 
> Ginny
> 
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Alex Kamantauskas wrote:
> 
> > 
> >  Most people I know change pager services so frequently that maintaining
> >  the POC pager number record would become a pain...
> > 
> > On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, ginny listman wrote:
> > 
> > > Do we need the ability to allow a POC to enter a pager phone number?
> > > 
> > > Ginny
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Alex Kamantauskas
> > alexk at tugger.net
> > 
> 
> 

-- 
Alex Kamantauskas
alexk at tugger.net