[arin-tech-discuss] Erroneous
Daniel Gauthier
dgauthier at gtcomm.net
Thu Apr 11 08:56:05 EDT 2013
On 2013-04-11, at 8:35 AM, Daniel <gaud at gaudtechnologies.com> wrote:
> Tim Garrison <tgarrison at ...> writes:
>
>>
>> Thanks, David. That cleared the issue right up!
>>
>> Tim Garrison
>> Software Engineer II
>> tgarrison at ...
>> 281.714.4213 direct
>> 713.540.4325 cell
>> 866.398.7638 toll-free
>> 281.714.4657 fax
>>
>> SoftLayer Technologies, Inc.
>> 315 Capitol Street
>> Suite 205
>> Houston, TX 77002
>> http://www.softlayer.com
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Huberman [mailto:dhuberma at ...]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 12:24 PM
>> To: Tim Garrison; arin-tech-discuss at ...
>> Subject: Re: [arin-tech-discuss] Erroneous "IP range overlaps with
> existing network(s)." errors
>>
>> Hi Tim,
>>
>> Thank you very much for your report. ARIN has corrected the issue, and all
> your calls should now be working
>> properly. The problem was an artifact of a new software deployment
> performed Saturday morning. There
>> were no adverse affects for the data in our registration system.
>>
>> Regards,
>> David
>>
>> ---
>> David R Huberman
>> Principal Technical Analyst, ARIN
>> 703-227-9866
>>
>> On 2/19/13 10:32 AM, "Tim Garrison" <tgarrison at ...> wrote:
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> For the last 3 days, any attempt to reassign a subnet with the RESTful API
> results in the following error:
>>
>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?> <error
> xmlns="http://www.arin.net/regrws/core/v1">
>> <additionalInfo/>
>> <code>E_ENTITY_VALIDATION</code>
>> <components>
>> <component>
>> <message>IP range overlaps with existing network(s).</message>
>> <name>startAddress</name>
>> </component>
>> </components>
>> <message>Payload entity failed to validate; see component messages for
> details.</message> </error>
>>
>> The subnet in question here is 173.193.174.104/29. I have verified that
> there are no other subnet
>> registrations in the adjacent space
>> (173.193.174.0/25 was analyzed and found to contain only subnets in
> ³Direct Allocation².
>>
>> My sample reassign payload is as follows:
>>
>> <?xml version="1.0"?>
>> <net xmlns="http://www.arin.net/regrws/core/v1">
>> <version>4</version>
>> <comment></comment>
>> <netBlocks>
>> <netBlock>
>> <type>S</type>
>> <startAddress>173.193.174.104</startAddress>
>> <cidrLength>29</cidrLength>
>> </netBlock>
>> </netBlocks>
>> <customerHandle>C03321089</customerHandle>
>> <netName>NET-173-193-174-104</netName>
>> <parentNetHandle>NET-173-192-0-0-1</parentNetHandle>
>> </net>
>>
>> Has anything changed recently that would be causing this error? Is there
> some other underlying issue
>> causing this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tim Garrison
>> Software Engineer II
>> tgarrison at ...
>> 281.714.4213 direct
>> 713.540.4325 cell
>> 866.398.7638 toll-free
>> 281.714.4657 fax
>>
>> SoftLayer Technologies, Inc.
>> 315 Capitol Street
>> Suite 205
>> Houston, TX 77002
>> http://www.softlayer.com
>>
>>
>
> Is it possible that the problem is back in the OT&E environment?
>
> if I do a whois on a specific IP, I get that nethandle : NET-72-10-165-8-1
>
> but if I try to remove that reassign by making a DELETE on
> /net/NET-72-10-165-8-1, I get this error
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><error
> xmlns="http://www.arin.net/regrws/core/v1"><additionalInfo/><code>E_OBJECT_NOT_FOUND</code><components><component><message>The
> referenced object does not
> exist.</message><name>handle</name></component></components><message>The
> referenced object does not exist.</message></error>
>
>
> if I try to reassign subnet to a customer, I get this error:
> <message>IP range overlaps with existing network(s).</message>
>
> it's like if the whois part was not in sync with the arin part anymore..
>
> the IP I'm testing with is 72.10.165.8/29 and I am using the OT&E for both
> arin and whois.
>
> thank you
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> arin-tech-discuss mailing list
> arin-tech-discuss at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-tech-discuss
I made another test,
I did a reassignment_report , I get this :
72.10.165.0 72.10.165.15 16
72.10.165.16 72.10.165.23 8
72.10.165.32 72.10.165.39 8
and my whois on IP 72.10.165.8 reports this :
..
["cidrLength"]=>
string(2) "29"
["endAddress"]=>
string(12) "72.10.165.15"
["description"]=>
string(10) "Reassigned"
["type"]=>
string(1) "S"
["startAddress"]=>
string(11) "72.10.165.8"
..
that doesn't match.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-tech-discuss/attachments/20130411/a9d89fdb/attachment.html>
More information about the arin-tech-discuss
mailing list