[arin-ppml] ARIN-2025-4: Resource Issuance to Natural Persons -- Request for Feedback

[Douglas Camin]

Scott -

I think the intent is to suggest that the community first focus on the merits of the policy ahead the costs. This does not mean cost is never a consideration, but at this juncture - this draft policy is brand new and only received an early staff and legal because of its legal implications - the questions to the community revolve around “is this good policy or not."

Hope that helps -


Doug






--

Douglas J. Camin

doug at dougcamin.com

From: Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com>
Date: Friday, July 11, 2025 at 1:31 PM
To: arin-ppml <arin-ppml at arin.net>, Douglas Camin <doug at dougcamin.com>
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2025-4: Resource Issuance to Natural Persons -- Request for Feedback

I wholeheartedly disagree. If the benefits of the policy change don’t exceed the costs, it’s not good policy. I’m not convinced we haven’t already wasted more of our collective time discussing this policy than will ever be saved by the small number of individuals who’d benefit from it (those who can’t easily apply as sole proprietors).

-Scott
On Jul 11, 2025 at 9:43 AM -0700, Douglas Camin <doug at dougcamin.com<mailto:doug at dougcamin.com>>, wrote:

Xavier -

Appreciate the feedback and question. When considering policy, it’s encouraged to consider the policy exclusively on the merits and not on cost. If it’s good policy, it should be implemented and if not, it should be abandoned. This keeps us focused on whether policy is sound or not. A sound policy can be expensive, and an unsound one can be cheap.

Hope that helps, though I know it doesn’t directly answer your question - we’d love to get your feedback on your views on what we should do with the policy.

Thanks!


Doug





--
Douglas J. Camin
ARIN Advisory Council
doug at dougcamin.com

From: ARIN-PPML <arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net> on behalf of Xavier via ARIN-PPML <arin-ppml at arin.net>
Date: Thursday, July 10, 2025 at 8:33 PM
To: Elizabeth Goodson <elizabeth.goodson at gmail.com>
Cc: ARIN-PPML at arin.net <ARIN-PPML at arin.net>
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2025-4: Resource Issuance to Natural Persons -- Request for Feedback


My feedback on this policy depends on what the "implementation cost" (referenced in the last paragraph of the Legal Review section) will be. Making it easier to access resources is probably worth $10,000 but is probably not worth $250,000, IMO. Do we have a ballpark estimate?

Thank you,
Xavier Clark

On Thursday, July 10th, 2025 at 7:27 PM, Elizabeth Goodson <elizabeth.goodson at gmail.com> wrote:
Hello PPML,

I'm shepherding this policy along with Doug Camin. We're seeking direction from the community as to how the AC should proceed with this policy. There was robust conversation on PPML in late May and early June, which tapered off quickly after the ARIN Staff and Legal analysis was published.

https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2025_4/#staff-and-legal-review-3-june-2025


Should we
- abandon this policy,
- accept this policy as written, or
- continue to revise this policy?

We appreciate your feedback.

Thanks,
Liz Goodson

_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20250711/76b8477d/attachment-0001.htm>