[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 2003-1: Required Performance of Abuse Contact

[Owen DeLong]

Merely revoking the ROAs wouldn’t do much in most cases as ROA non-existent doesn’t usually result in route rejection.

OTOH, ARIN theoretically could remap their ROAs to AS0 which would have a severe impact. NOTE: I’m not saying this is a good
Idea, merely pointing out the details of what would be necessary.

Owen


> On Aug 29, 2025, at 13:52, David Conrad via ARIN-PPML <arin-ppml at arin.net> wrote:
> 
> On Aug 29, 2025, at 1:05 PM, Aaron Wendel <aaron at wholesaleinternet.net> wrote:
>> I'm not sure how ARIN would enforce this anyway since they have no hand in routing policy or routing on the operational level. 
> 
> Violators have their ROAs revoked?
> 
> (Not a serious suggestion, just an observation that the assertion that ARIN has “no hand in routing policy or routing on the operational level” is no longer necessarily true)
> 
> Regards,
> -drc
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20250829/e28540f4/attachment.htm>