<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;">Merely revoking the ROAs wouldn’t do much in most cases as ROA non-existent doesn’t usually result in route rejection.<div><br></div><div>OTOH, ARIN theoretically could remap their ROAs to AS0 which would have a severe impact. NOTE: I’m not saying this is a good</div><div>Idea, merely pointing out the details of what would be necessary.</div><div><br></div><div>Owen</div><div><br id="lineBreakAtBeginningOfMessage"><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>On Aug 29, 2025, at 13:52, David Conrad via ARIN-PPML <arin-ppml@arin.net> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"><div style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;">On Aug 29, 2025, at 1:05 PM, Aaron Wendel <aaron@wholesaleinternet.net> wrote:<br><div><blockquote type="cite"><span style="font-family: "Segoe UI"; font-size: 16px;">I'm not sure how ARIN would enforce this anyway since they have no hand in routing policy or routing on the operational level. </span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Violators have their ROAs revoked?</div><br></div><div>(Not a serious suggestion, just an observation that the assertion that ARIN has “no hand in routing policy or routing on the operational level” is no longer necessarily true)</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>-drc</div><div><br></div><br></div>_______________________________________________<br>ARIN-PPML<br>You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to<br>the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).<br>Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br>https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml<br>Please contact info@arin.net if you experience any issues.<br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>