[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2024-8: Restrict the Largest Initial IPv6 Allocation to /20

[William Herrin]

On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 2:46 PM David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
>  As I said, the current policy seems to be functioning as intended.

Hi David,

I can't prove a negative, so let me turn the question around on you:
we know a /16 has been allocated. We can't know how they justified it
because that information is private. Can you produce a -notional-
justification for a /16 that we all agree is -reasonable-? If you
cannot, then what purpose is served by allowing such consumptive
registrations?

Regards,
Bill Herrin



-- 
William Herrin
bill at herrin.us
https://bill.herrin.us/