[arin-ppml] ARIN-2023-8 - Reduce 4.1.8 Maximum Allocation

[Denis Motova]

Hello everyone,

I hope you're all well here in the PPML.

I'd like to express my gratitude to Gerry George for effectively communicating these policy questions with the community. Thank you for that.

Here are my thoughts:

1. There is no necessity to revise the policy. I believe this policy should be abandoned.
2. I abstain from commenting on this point as the previous point presents my stance clearly on this matter.
3. If somehow, this policy was to be implemented (it shouldn’t be), it should NOT apply retroactively.

Similar to Owen's earlier message, I oppose treating current pending users on the waiting list differently from those who completed the grandfathering process under the existing terms. This policy attempts to rectify something that doesn't require correction and is currently functioning adequately.

Thanks again!
Denis


On 20 Jun 2024, at 5:00 AM, Gerry E.. George <ggeorge at digisolv.com> wrote:

ARIN Community –



As a co-shepherd on policy 2023-8 (Gerry George & Brian Jones), we are soliciting the community for feedback on this policy proposal following the discussions and opinions expressed at and since ARIN53.



They have been distilled into a few main opinions (in no particular order):
1. Policy not needed (no change).
2. Do away with the Waitlist completely.
3.Leave the /22 Maximum Allocation unchanged, but introduce a different method or formula of weighting the Waitlist requests to incorporate wait times and allocation size.
4. Continue to work on it, and clarify wording.
5. If to move forward, MUST address those currently on the Wait List and will they be Grandfathered in? (Fairness)





Questions for the Community:
a. Do we keep working on this policy? (Y/N - #1, #2)
b. If yes, should consideration be given for some formula or weighted method towards allocations to queue occupants? (#3, #4)
c. If yes, is there a need to add a clause for dealing with existing waitlist occupants? (#4, #5)
And if so, how should they be handled?

Note that if such a clause is determined for inclusion (#5), it will likely apply to ALL currently on the waitlist as at a specific point in time and they ALL would thus be subject to any such clause in the policy, once adopted.



Thank you.

Gerry E. George
ICT Consultant and Business Solutions Architect;
DigiSolv, Inc. [P.O. Box 1677, Castries, Saint Lucia]
________________________________
Mobile: (758) 728-4858 / Int'l Office: (347) 450-3444 / Skype: DigiSolv
Email: ggeorge at digisolv.com<mailto:ggeorge at digisolv.com>    /    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerrygeorge/

Please consider the environment before printing this email. Thank you.

_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20240621/f391f91d/attachment-0001.htm>