[arin-ppml] Revised - ARIN-2023-8: Reduce 4.1.8 Maximum Allocation

[Fernando Frediani]

On 22/02/2024 02:14, Owen DeLong wrote:
> <clip>
> Yes, YOU made those decisions for YOUR network. Now you are trying to 
> force those decisions (specifically deployment of CGNAT) onto others 
> through policy. No sale here.

No, these decisions are made taking into account the reality of the 
things, or do you think it is fine to completely disregard the IPv4 
exhaustion and keep assigning scarce IPv4 resources from the waiting 
list in total luxury to those who are able to go to the market and 
transfer more addresses in other to fulfill their decision to not do 
CGNAT ? Do you think there is any fairness on this ? Or even forcing 
this method to make the waiting list more difficult to those who need 
even more as a way to force - who knows who - to deploy IPv6 ?

I cannot agree there is reasonableness in keep allowing organizations 
who already have any size of allocation to receive in whatever is left 
for the waiting list if they have more conditions to transfer further 
IPv4 space should they require. This is the fairness which is sought in 
the policy development process.

Fernando

>
> Owen
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20240222/4320780d/attachment.htm>