[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2022-3: Remove Officer Attestation Requirement for 8.5.5

[A N]

Hello -
Taking off my ARIN AC hat and speaking personally, I oppose this.
I believe - even though it's not perfect - keeping the requirement in place
provides a form of risk mitigation both for organizations and for ARIN.

-Anita

On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 11:51 AM Joe Provo <ppml at rsuc.gweep.net> wrote:

>
> Hey folks,
>
> We haven't had any feedback here after the publication
> of the Staff & Legal review as noted in Matthew's message
> below.  Given that it speaks directly to concerns raised
> here on PPML, we need community feedback here to confirm
> *our* impressions.
>
> Please let us know!
>
> Joe
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:50:13PM -0700, Matthew Wilder wrote:
> > Hi PPML,
> >
> > Staff and Legal review has been conducted for Draft Policy ARIN-2022-3.
> The
> > relevant bit for the community to consider is the legal review, which is
> as
> > follows:
> > "No material legal issue. Removal of the officer attestation would not
> > materially impact ARIN???s ability to pursue cases of fraud."
> >
> > As shepherds, we believe this directly resolves the primary concern
> voiced
> > by members of the community.
> >
> > For the full staff and legal review, please check the following:
> >
> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2022_3/#staff-and-legal-review-15-august-2022
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > *Matthew Wilder*
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 12:24 PM Matthew Wilder <matthew.wilder at telus.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi PPML,
> > >
> > > I appreciate the lively discussion thus far on ARIN-2022-3, including
> > > concerns around what prosecutorial powers might be lost if officer
> > > attestations are no longer required. Thanks also to staff for
> summarizing
> > > the result of the ACSP Consultation 2021.4 retiring the officer
> attestation
> > > requirement for documentation of needs assessment.
> > >
> > > The prevailing concern in the community around ARIN-2022-3 appears to
> be
> > > that removing officer attestation would impede the prosecution of those
> > > conducting fraud. In order to have the experts address this concern, I
> > > (along with my fellow policy shepherd Joe) have requested a staff and
> legal
> > > review. Our hope is that staff (and legal counsel in particular) might
> > > directly weigh in on how important the officer attestation is.
> > >
> > > We will make sure that relevant points are highlighted back to PPML for
> > > the community to consider in further discussion of the draft policy.
> > >
> > > Warm regards,
> > >
> > > *Matthew Wilder*
> > >
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > ARIN-PPML
> > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> > Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
>
> --
> Posted from my personal account - see X-Disclaimer header.
> Joe Provo / Gweep / Earthling
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20220912/0b3999b5/attachment.htm>