[arin-ppml] Nomcom rejection explanatory letter

[Michael B. Williams]

Agreed. This is utterly embarrassing. How did they think this is an
appropriate response given the conversation going on this list? Perhaps
lawyers? What needs to be done to fix this so if those being rejected
request transparency that transparency is provided?

On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 3:18 PM William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 9:44 AM Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > this non-explanation makes a mockery of the entire concept of an
> explanation.
>
> +1
>
> When in the course of human events, a decent respect to the opinions
> of mankind requires we say the dude just wasn't good enough. Really?
>
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin
>
>
> --
> William Herrin
> bill at herrin.us
> https://bill.herrin.us/
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20211104/41b02672/attachment.htm>