[arin-ppml] Open Petition for ARIN-2020-2

[Alyssa Moore]

Hi Scott,

Anita Nikolich (AC member) answered this on Dec 16:

>Please note (and you can refer to the Nov AC minutes) that organizations
that are currently on the waitlist won’t be affected, because the next
disbursement of v4 would fulfill all the exempted orgs as well as the ones
remaining on the list. The overall impact to the current waitlist is
non-existent from these requests.

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 9:21 AM <scott at solarnetone.org> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> In these deliberations, I think it would be useful to know how many actual
> ARIN Member Organizations would be effected.  I am not talking about
> downstream customers, affiliates, or the like, but only resource holders
> on the actual waitlist.  Does John Sweeting have any metrics as to this?
> Further, if all effected organizations were to receive the allocations
> they are seeking, what percentage of the available address inventory would
> be immediately exhausted?
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
>
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021, John Curran wrote:
>
> > On 14 Jan 2021, at 11:00 AM, Michael B. Williams
> > <Michael.Williams at glexia.com> wrote:
> >
> >       How does ARIN analyze the response from this? Is there weight
> >       given only to ARIN member organizations or any organization? If
> >       anyone is given consideration, what is to stop people from
> >       lobbying individuals and other organizations to send an email to
> >       support their agenda? For example, I could very easily find 500
> >       people to respond to this email saying they do not support the
> >       policy. If I were a malicious actor trying to influence policy
> >       discussion and were to offer some sort of incentive for those to
> >       reply I could easily have thousands of organizations supporting
> >       this policy one way or another.
> >
> > My feelings would be the majority of the weight should be given to
> > ARIN member organizations voices as part of the tallying process. If
> > that is the case, perhaps we should ask those organizations to include
> > their ARIN org id?
> >
> >
> > Michael -
> >
> > The ARIN Policy Development Process specifies the petition appeal
> process,
> > and the sole criteria for a successful petition is expressions of support
> > from at least 25 different people from 25 different organizations.
> >
> > Note that a successful petition simply means that the policy – without
> any
> > recommendation of adoption from the ARIN Advisory Council – will be sent
> to
> > the ARIN Board of Trustees for their consideration of possible adoption.
> >  Also note that for the purpose of determining petition success, ARIN
> staff
> > will only be counting those messages which clearly indicate support for
> the
> > petition and include both the submitters name and their organization.
> >
> > The ARIN Board is on the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List, and will see
> any
> > discussion of substantial merits or concerns with the policy.  Each
> trustee
> > is free to weight such input as they see fit, but at this point it is
> not a
> > numerical question – as we are not seeking a poll of support or
> opposition
> > to the policy – but rather simply whether at least 25 organizations feel
> > (despite the ARIN AC’s decision not to recommend) that policy warrants
> > consideration by the ARIN Board of Trustees.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > /John
> >
> > John Curran
> > President and CEO
> > American Registry for Internet Numbers
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20210114/88864761/attachment.htm>