[arin-ppml] Board of Trustees Consideration Petition for ARIN -2020 -2: Reinstatement of Organizations Removed from Waitlist by Implementation of ARIN-2019-16

[hostmaster at uneedus.com]

I am also opposed.

The limited amount of addresses that will come into the wait list at this 
point do not make it worth having that waiting list.  I would rather 
divert all returns into the reserved pools such as 4.10.

I also agree that it appears to have been drafted to benefit limited 
parties, rather than the community at large.

It is about time for those IPv4 only networks that need more space to 
finally make the step to IPv6, where address space will not be an issue 
for a long long time.

Albert Erdmann
Network Administrator
Paradise On Line Inc.

On Tue, 12 Jan 2021, John Santos wrote:

> I do not support this policy or petition.
>
> I also don't understand why organizations desiring more than a very small 
> block have any reasonable expectation of it ever being available from the 
> wait list.
>
> It's like demanding a reserved seat in one of the lifeboats that the Titanic 
> would have had if it met modern lifeboat capacity standards.
>
> I think this whole discussion is a waste of time.
>
> -- 
> John Santos
> Evans Griffiths & Hart, Inc.
> 781-861-0670 ext 539
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>