[arin-ppml] Revised - Draft Policy ARIN-2020-3: IPv6 Nano-allocations

[Sadiq Saif]

On 2020-06-23 11:42, John Santos wrote:
> While I support this in principle, what is to prevent someone from 
> violating the intent by getting a /40 and assigning /56's to 40,000 
> customers, instead of /48's to no more than 250 customers?

I don't think that's the intent of this draft policy but even if it was, 
enforcement of a ISP's IPv6 assignment structure for customers seems out 
of scope for ARIN.

I am in favour of the draft policy as it is currently written. I hope 
this encourages small networks to pick up a IPv6 prefix and start on 
deployment while not worrying about increasing their ARIN related expenses.

-- 
Sadiq Saif [AS393949]
https://sadiqsaif.com